Feature Requests

Feature request: custom/hex color input (or deeper swatch coverage) for texture layers
I'm designing a multi-key set with material-based textures - each material has a base color and an overlay color for the texture/grain, both meant to stay in the same color family (e.g. two related browns for wood grain) so it reads as one material rather than a graphic printed on top. In practice, I keep running into the same wall: the fixed swatch list for a given hue often doesn't have a dark option that's still saturated. In the Brown set, for example, the swatches that are meaningfully darker than a mid-tone brown base also drop to noticeably less saturated (greyer) - there isn't a dark-and-still-warm option available. So I'm stuck choosing between three bad options: accept a texture that's too low-contrast to read, accept a texture that reads grey/muted instead of matching the wood tone, or break the "same material family" rule and reach into a different color group entirely. For comparison, this wasn't a problem in the Blue set I used elsewhere in the same design - it had darker, still-saturated options near my base tone, so that pair worked on the first try. It seems like some hue families in the current swatch libraries are just less densely populated at the darker end than others, which makes this an inconsistent experience depending on which color family your material happens to use. A custom color/hex input for texture/overlay layers would solve this directly - even a simple RGB or hex field would do it. If that's a bigger lift, an alternative would be auditing the existing swatch sets to make sure each hue family has options across the full brightness range without losing saturation, so results are more consistent across colors. Happy to share more detail on the specific swatches/values if useful - just wanted to flag this as a real gap I hit, not a one-off preference. Thanks!
0
Add Tag support to "My Custom Sets" screen
There needs to be a way of grouping custom sets. Because I've made several iterations of a design, scrolling and loading, then scrolling and loading again and again, to a previous design is very cumbersome, especially since I have to do that every time I view a set and then come back to the "My Custom Sets" screen. If we could add tags to a design, then have a filter at the top of the "My Custom Sets" screen, we could more easily get to the designs we're looking for. Recommendations: Every design initially (and then every new design afterwards) gets a default tag. Think of this like how Gmail adds "Inbox" to every new email. Then when you want to "archive" an email, it just removes the "Inbox" tag, so it doesn't show up by default in the main view. The default tag in the "My Custom Sets" screen filter could be "CurrentSets" (or some other name in this context). If you want to view all of your sets, you remove the default tag from the filter, like how Gmail has an "All Mail" view. Alternatively, you could start with designs not having any default tags. But have a second tags filter control in the "My Custom Sets" screen to exclude tags. That way someone could, for example, add an "Archive" tag to certain designs and exclude them from the view. Or have some other method to archive designs so they can still be viewed, just not by default The tags filter control in the "My Custom Sets" screen should: a) remember the last value you used. b) provide a way of viewing the list of all of your tags. c) allow for multiple tags to be selected. The design editor should: a) provide a way to add a new tag. b) provide a way to view all tags. c) be able to select one or more tags to be saved to the design. d) copy tags to a cloned design. I know adding tags will be a little cumbersome at first for people that have a lot of designs in their list, but it will make going through the designs in the "My Custom Sets" screen so much easier.
0
Load More